Court orders FIR to be filed against directors of airline charter services company for cheating

A Delhi court ordered FIR registration against two directors of a city-based air charter services company for allegedly failing to provide helicopter service to a man despite receiving money, noting that the duo had an “intention to cheat”.

Further Sessions Judge Anuj Agrawal issued the order on the petition for review filed by plaintiff Anis Ahmad against the magistrate’s order dismissing his plea requesting registration of the FIR against the duo and an employee for failing to provide the helicopter for the wedding of his niece after receiving the payment of five Rs. lakh in March 2019.

The complainant alleged that the manager did not refund the amount paid after canceling the service and stopped taking his calls, after which he learned that they had closed the office.

He added that one of the defendants had also threatened him. He lodged two complaints with Jamia Nagar Police Station and the Deputy Police Commissioner (DCP) in September and October 2019, but no action was taken.

Police later told the court that the dispute was civil and that there had been no incitement or cheating. Allowing the petition for review, the judge of the additional sessions said: “It appears that Respondents No.1 and 2, as principals, intended to deceive the revisionist (Ahmad) from the start because they didn’t have not explained why not. the services were provided to the revisionist despite receipt of the amount.

In addition, there is nothing in the record to indicate that they had the required authorization from the appropriate authority to provide helicopter services to the complainant at the relevant time as promised, the judge noted.

“A police investigation would be necessary to recover the defrauded amount, to determine if the respondent had the required authorization to provide the services promised by them and for an effective investigation,” he said.

The judge added: “This request for review is authorized. The contested ordinance is quashed. The magistrate is therefore requested to order the relevant SHO to register an FIR under the appropriate provisions of the law against Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 as administrators. because he was deceived by the administrators and did not pay the wages of the last six months. The judge asked the police to investigate as well.


Source link

Veronica J. Snell